Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing · Texas

Atec, Inc.

Stafford, TX · ~190 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atec, Inc. runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Atec, Inc.: 3.4 TCR = 103% of Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atec, Inc. safety composite

Atec, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2017→2024

Atec, Inc. injury rate improved

Atec, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.6 from 6.1 in 2017 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.1 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Stafford, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 103% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #32/39
  • PHOTO Niles Precision Comp…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Niles Precision Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Atec, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atec, Inc. averages 3.4 TCR (103% of the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atec, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.1 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Atec, Inc. falls in its industry

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 39 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. employers in Texas.

Atec, Inc. (190 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Atec, Inc.
Atec, Inc. (190 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Atec, Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2023 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2022 6.8 6.3 4 11 0
2021 5.3 5.3 2 9 0
2020 5.1 5.1 1 10 0
2019 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 6.1 1.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · TX · Stafford

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 117 employers in Stafford, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Niles Precision Company 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR May Technology & Manufacturing 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LMI - Vista 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEWBERN 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Natural Prairie Dairy Farms, LLC 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE BKB 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capp Electric 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hargrave Power, Inc 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Residential, Inc. 1,593 FTE
CITY-NEAR STAFFORD (TXSTA) 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXSTA - STAFFORD 1,479 FTE
CITY-NEAR 915 408 FTE
NAT-TCR The Inn at Library Way 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Turfway Park LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Department of Transportation 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR International Paper 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hood Container New Johnsonville 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hood Container Nashville 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Federal-Mogul Products 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Monica Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.