Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing · Michigan

Mayco Groesbeck

Clinton Twp, MI · ~171 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayco Groesbeck runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Mayco Groesbeck: 3.6 TCR = 68% of Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayco Groesbeck safety composite

Mayco Groesbeck scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mayco Groesbeck: 2.7 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.24× in 2024

Mayco Groesbeck's TCR rose 3.4 from 2.7 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Clinton Twp, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #64/100
  • PHOTO JVIS USA LLC Benton …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JVIS USA LLC Benton Harbor Territorial (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Mayco Groesbeck in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayco Groesbeck averages 3.6 TCR (68% of the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayco Groesbeck TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=1 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Mayco Groesbeck falls in its industry

384 Motor vehicle interior systems establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 100 Motor vehicle interior systems employers in Michigan.

Mayco Groesbeck (171 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayco Groesbeck
Mayco Groesbeck (171 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Mayco Groesbeck has fewer employees than the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., he median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 0.9 7 0 0
2023 2.7 0.9 3 0 0
2022 9.3 0.9 10 0 0
2021 4.3 1.1 4 0 0
2020 5.5 2.8 6 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2017 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2016 2.7 1.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · MI · Clinton Twp

384 Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 23 employers in Clinton Twp, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JVIS USA LLC Benton Harbor Territorial 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toyota Boshoku Kentucky Lebanon 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fisher Dynamics - Northeast 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AmSafe 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Manistee - Chemicals 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edwards Garment Co. 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Rapids Controls 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE JVIS USA LLC Benton Harbor Crystal 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Clinton Township 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer 243 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR 243 - Clinton Twp 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR 018-00528 156 FTE
NAT-TCR Competitive Interiors Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Wall Systems, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Richlyn Mfg Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LakeVille 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orrex Plastics 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zeus Gaston 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Packaging Corporation 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles, Ca 171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.