Airframe assemblies (except for guided missiles) manufacturing · Texas

Mayday Manufacturing Co.

Denton, TX · ~240 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayday Manufacturing Co. runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airframe assemblies (except for guided missiles) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Mayday Manufacturing Co.: 2.7 TCR = 82% of Airframe assemblies (except for guided missiles) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayday Manufacturing Co. safety composite

Mayday Manufacturing Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mayday Manufacturing Co.: 0.5 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2024

Mayday Manufacturing Co.'s TCR rose 2.2 from 0.5 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Denton, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #29/39
  • PHOTO Safran Landing Syste…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~240 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Safran Landing Systems Kentucky LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Mayday Manufacturing Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayday Manufacturing Co. averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Airframe assemblies (except for guided missiles) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayday Manufacturing Co. TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=4 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=3.4 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Mayday Manufacturing Co. falls in its industry

650 Airframe assemblies (except fo establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 39 Airframe assemblies (except fo employers in Texas.

Mayday Manufacturing Co. (240 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayday Manufacturing Co.
Mayday Manufacturing Co. (240 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Mayday Manufacturing Co. has more employees than the Airframe assemblies (except for guided m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.0 11 0 0
2021 3.4 2.3 6 0 0
2020 3.2 1.8 7 0 0
2019 4.0 2.9 11 0 0
2018 2.6 1.1 7 0 0
2017 2.5 1.2 6 0 0
2016 0.5 0.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · TX · Denton

650 Airframe assemblies (except for guided missiles) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 211 employers in Denton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Safran Landing Systems Kentucky LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RSA Engineered Products 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamco America 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jari Drive 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6325 Hwy 380 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Denbow Company, INC 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Empire Roofing Inc. 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Innovation Group - Dallas 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Paccar 2,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Motors Company 2,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Denton 1,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR 060 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton 1,040 FTE
NAT-TCR Fusion Optix 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR REW Landscape Corp 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 04-Louisville 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S3PL Wynne 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Minnesota Department of Transportation District 8 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brammer Bio Florida 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Red Cross - 9013 Perimeter Woods Dr 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spoonflower Durham Facility 240 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.