Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture · Texas

Peterbilt Motors Company

Denton, TX · ~2,095 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Peterbilt Motors Company runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade B.

Peterbilt Motors Company: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Peterbilt Motors Company safety composite

Peterbilt Motors Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Peterbilt Motors Company: 0.6 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2021

Peterbilt Motors Company's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336120 · Denton, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Airport Facility
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 185 inj
  • SIZE ~2,095 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Airport Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Peterbilt Motors Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Peterbilt Motors Company averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Peterbilt Motors Company TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=1.8 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Peterbilt Motors Company falls in its industry

124 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, employers in Texas.

Peterbilt Motors Company (2,095 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Peterbilt Motors Company
Peterbilt Motors Company (2,095 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Peterbilt Motors Company has more employees than the Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.2 1.9 40 1 0
2020 1.2 0.8 24 0 0
2019 2.7 2.0 75 0 0
2017 1.8 0.9 33 3 0
2016 0.6 0.4 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336120 · TX · Denton

124 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 211 employers in Denton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Airport Facility 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spartan Fire - Charlotte 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest Refurbishment Center 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTS - Mt. Holly 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NXP Semiconductors 2,100 FTE
STATE-SIZE TX015 2,104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SAT3 2,085 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beaumont SCANfining Project (BMSF) 2,106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Paccar 2,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Denton 1,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR 060 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton 1,040 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical City Denton 1,001 FTE
NAT-TCR Generation Fossil Miller Steam Plant 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Care at Home (247-ATLA2) 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SMM Group SMR Brooklyn 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Land Clearing Specialists, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary 2,095 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharp Chula Vista Medical Ctr 2,094 FTE
NAT-SIZE Executive Management Services, Inc 2,096 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Illinois University 2,096 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.