Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production · California

Mayflower Farms Inc

Arbuckle, CA · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayflower Farms Inc runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production workplace, earning a grade F.

Mayflower Farms Inc: 14.1 TCR = 313% of Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayflower Farms Inc safety composite

Mayflower Farms Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mayflower Farms Inc: 13.9 → 16.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2024

Mayflower Farms Inc's TCR rose 2.7 from 13.9 in 2017 to 16.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Arbuckle, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.1 · 313% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #170/175
  • PHOTO T&A - Imperial - Har…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: T&A - Imperial - Harvest (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mayflower Farms Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayflower Farms Inc averages 14.1 TCR (313% of the Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayflower Farms Inc TCR series: 2017=13.9 · 2019=11.7 · 2024=16.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Mayflower Farms Inc falls in its industry

331 Tomato farming (except under c establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #170 safest of 175 Tomato farming (except under c employers in California.

Mayflower Farms Inc (21 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayflower Farms Inc
Mayflower Farms Inc (21 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Mayflower Farms Inc has fewer employees than the Tomato farming (except under cover), fie median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.6 5.5 3 0 0
2019 11.7 7.8 3 0 0
2017 13.9 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Arbuckle

331 Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 20 employers in Arbuckle, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR T&A - Imperial - Harvest 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAL-O SHIPPING 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Coast Harvesting & Packing, Inc. 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smoky Mountain Family Farms LLC - Newport TN PH 14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Mardo Davis 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR T & P Farms, LP 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alsco Geyer Irrigation, Inc. 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arbuckle Rice Mill 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Valley Rice, LLC 112 FTE
NAT-TCR Minneapolis - Minnesota 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0743 Charlotte 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Minooka Fire Protection District 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR WRNC, Inc. dba Chapel Woods Health and Rehabilitation 14.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pennington County Highway Department 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Country Distributors, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Trucking 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Benton County - Public Works 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.