Environmental health program administration · Minnesota

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building

St Paul, MN · ~605 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Environmental health program administration workplace, earning a grade A.

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Environmental health program administration BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building safety composite

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building held a steady TCR band

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923120 · St Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #13/29
  • PHOTO Minnesota Department…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~605 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minnesota Department of Health - St Cloud (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Environmental health program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building falls in its industry

267 Environmental health program a establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 29 Environmental health program a employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building (605 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building
Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building (605 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Minnesota Department of Health - Freeman Building has more employees than the Environmental health program administrat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.6 0.2 3 0 0
2018 1.8 0.8 9 0 0
2017 0.7 0.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923120 · MN · St Paul

267 Environmental health program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minnesota Department of Health - St Cloud 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCA - BHS AOAS Westminster Clinic 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virginia Department of Health 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brown County Public Health Department 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 401 Nicollet Mall 605 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing 606 FTE
STATE-SIZE Graco Inc. - Koch Center 607 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plunkett's Pest Control 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0029 2352 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 2452 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Coastal Construction - Surf Club 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MG Dyess, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 605 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dmc1 605 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Greensboro Fire Department 605 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pc - Cs S 605 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.