Mycology health laboratories · Minnesota

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services

Rochester, MN · ~776 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Mycology health laboratories workplace, earning a grade A.

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services: 0.8 TCR = 21% of Mycology health laboratories BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services safety composite

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services held a steady TCR band

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.5 in 2017 to 0.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.5 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621511 · Rochester, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO WW-TRL-WOODWARD
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~776 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WW-TRL-WOODWARD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services averages 0.8 TCR (21% of the Mycology health laboratories BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services TCR series: 2017=0.5 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services falls in its industry

162 Mycology health laboratories establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Mycology health laboratories employers in Minnesota.

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services (776 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services
Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services (776 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services has more employees than the Mycology health laboratories median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.2 0.2 2 0 0
2019 0.9 0.8 6 1 0
2018 1.6 0.6 10 1 0
2017 0.5 0.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621511 · MN · Rochester

162 Mycology health laboratories employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WW-TRL-WOODWARD 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Myriad Women's Health 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neo Aliso Viejo 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Myriad Genetics 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE FUN.com Inc 776 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN017 MINNETONKA-9700 HEALTH CARE LN 779 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauk Rapids-Rice Public Schools 779 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR Ehrhardt's Lebanon LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gardner Denver, Inc. Tulsa 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1564 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Carboline Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGB4 776 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hebrew Home of the Aged dba Jewish Home 776 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Lexington, KY-USA 776 FTE
NAT-SIZE T.RAD North America, Inc. 776 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.