Senior Living · Utah

MBK - Charleston

Cedar Hills, UT · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MBK - Charleston runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Senior Living workplace, earning a grade F.

MBK - Charleston: 8.3 TCR = 218% of Senior Living BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MBK - Charleston safety composite

MBK - Charleston scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MBK - Charleston held a steady TCR band

MBK - Charleston's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 24.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=24.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cedar Hills, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 218% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/44
  • PHOTO Residences at Deer C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Residences at Deer Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

MBK - Charleston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MBK - Charleston averages 8.3 TCR (218% of the Senior Living BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MBK - Charleston TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=24.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where MBK - Charleston falls in its industry

6,510 Senior Living establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 44 Senior Living employers in Utah.

MBK - Charleston (47 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MBK - Charleston
MBK - Charleston (47 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

MBK - Charleston has fewer employees than the Senior Living median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 24.9 21.7 1 7 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · UT · Cedar Hills

6,510 Senior Living employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 4 employers in Cedar Hills, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Residences at Deer Creek 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Santa Barbara 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keepsake Village of Columbus 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63137 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CP Build Enterprises LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE NFSL1 - Salt Lake City UT 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103189 - Provo-Orem Transportation Improvement 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4175_7943 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4689 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4689 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Charleston at Cedar Hills 50 FTE
NAT-TCR Engineered Films Sioux Falls 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunnycrest Senior Living 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SWALK Operations, LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MXL Industries, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Climate Pros-Pharr 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Manufacturing & Installation Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Competitive Piping Systems, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chart Lifecycle 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.