Assisted Living Facilities · Utah

The Charleston at Cedar Hills

Cedar Hills, UT · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Charleston at Cedar Hills runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Charleston at Cedar Hills: 6.3 TCR = 166% of Assisted Living Facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Charleston at Cedar Hills safety composite

The Charleston at Cedar Hills scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Charleston at Cedar Hills: 3.6 → 10.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2024

The Charleston at Cedar Hills's TCR rose 6.4 from 3.6 in 2022 to 10.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cedar Hills, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 166% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #18/44
  • PHOTO The Springs at Lake …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Springs at Lake Oswego (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

The Charleston at Cedar Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Charleston at Cedar Hills averages 6.3 TCR (166% of the Assisted Living Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Charleston at Cedar Hills TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=10 · BLS 3.8

Where The Charleston at Cedar Hills falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 44 Assisted Living Facilities employers in Utah.

The Charleston at Cedar Hills (50 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Charleston at Cedar Hills
The Charleston at Cedar Hills (50 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Charleston at Cedar Hills has more employees than the Assisted Living Facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 3.3 3 0 0
2023 5.3 2.7 2 0 0
2022 3.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · UT · Cedar Hills

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 4 employers in Cedar Hills, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Springs at Lake Oswego 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6848-68480001-000019 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Richland Hills 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE NFS:NFSL1 - NFSL1-Salt Lake City, UT 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solution Builders, LLC. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE IES Communications, LLC - Salt Lake City 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grain Craft UT 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4689 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4689 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR MBK - Charleston 47 FTE
NAT-TCR Ottumwa Ia - 3185 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lima Oh - 3184 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Huber Heights, OH - MK Plant 13 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR GKN Sinter Metals- Germantown 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Banyan Deliveries, LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamik XP LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelby Dc Bldg 410 - 3439 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rapid Connections 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.