Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Pennsylvania

MBM Contracting Inc.

Pittsburgh, PA · ~128 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MBM Contracting Inc. runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

MBM Contracting Inc.: 4.4 TCR = 152% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MBM Contracting Inc. safety composite

MBM Contracting Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MBM Contracting Inc. held a steady TCR band

MBM Contracting Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 3.0 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.0 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 152% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #170/251
  • PHOTO CML SPECIALTIES
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CML SPECIALTIES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

MBM Contracting Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MBM Contracting Inc. averages 4.4 TCR (152% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MBM Contracting Inc. TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 2.9

Where MBM Contracting Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #170 safest of 251 Construction management, comme employers in Pennsylvania.

MBM Contracting Inc. (128 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate MBM Contracting Inc.
MBM Contracting Inc. (128 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

MBM Contracting Inc. has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.9 3 0 0
2023 6.9 2.3 9 0 0
2022 3.5 0.0 4 0 0
2021 5.3 2.7 6 0 0
2020 6.6 0.9 7 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 4 0 0
2018 4.7 0.7 7 0 0
2017 3.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CML SPECIALTIES 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Samuels Group - Wisconsin 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loyd Builders, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hendrix & Arp Contracting Services, LLC 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE DM Sabia & Co Inc 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rutter's Dairy 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennwood Products 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northampton PA - 227 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Commercial Freight Services, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Rail and Mfg. Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR IFF Jacksonville, FL 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Engraving Corporation 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Robert C Geer Memorial Hospital Inc 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Laurels of Hudsonville 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newark Nj - 059 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE TP Orthodontics, Inc. 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.