Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities · Michigan

The Laurels of Hudsonville

Hudsonville, MI · ~128 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Laurels of Hudsonville runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Laurels of Hudsonville: 4.5 TCR = 69% of Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Laurels of Hudsonville safety composite

The Laurels of Hudsonville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

The Laurels of Hudsonville injury rate improved

The Laurels of Hudsonville's TCR fell 2.3 from 5.7 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 55.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=55.1 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Hudsonville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.5 · 69% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #103/471
  • PHOTO Bay Shores Senior Ca…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bay Shores Senior Care & Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

The Laurels of Hudsonville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Laurels of Hudsonville averages 4.5 TCR (69% of the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Laurels of Hudsonville TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=55.1 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 6.5

Where The Laurels of Hudsonville falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skille establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 471 Nursing Care Facilities Skille employers in Michigan.

The Laurels of Hudsonville (128 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Laurels of Hudsonville
The Laurels of Hudsonville (128 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Laurels of Hudsonville has more employees than the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 6 0 0
2020 55.1 55.1 6 45 0
2019 5.3 4.0 4 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 5 0 0
2017 3.4 2.2 3 0 0
2016 5.7 5.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Hudsonville

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 62 employers in Hudsonville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bay Shores Senior Care & Rehab 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PF Southern Hills SNF Ops, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Manor of Marion County, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bishop Wicke Health and Rehabilitation 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Purpose Point Harvesting LLC 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lombardo Homes of SE Michigan 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Boldt Company - MI 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Michigan - Gaylord 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR HIH INC 585 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quincy 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kent Quality Foods 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8373_19059 346 FTE
NAT-TCR Little Falls Hospital 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR UFP White Bear Lake, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 3050 Cash Wise South Fargo 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tower Industries LTD 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE US Foods Pittston 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newark Nj - 059 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE TP Orthodontics, Inc. 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE HNL 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.