Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network · New Hampshire

MC Logistics LLC

Nashua, NH · ~66 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MC Logistics LLC runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network workplace, earning a grade D.

MC Logistics LLC: 10.3 TCR = 159% of Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MC Logistics LLC safety composite

MC Logistics LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.3

2020→2023

MC Logistics LLC injury rate improved

MC Logistics LLC's TCR fell 23.3 from 23.3 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 23.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=23.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=17.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Nashua, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/41
  • PHOTO PKM Logistics
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PKM Logistics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

MC Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MC Logistics LLC averages 10.3 TCR (159% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MC Logistics LLC TCR series: 2020=23.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=17.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 6.5

Where MC Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 41 Local letter and parcel delive employers in New Hampshire.

MC Logistics LLC (66 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate MC Logistics LLC
MC Logistics LLC (66 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

MC Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 17.9 11.0 13 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 23.3 23.3 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NH · Nashua

6,679 Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 179 employers in Nashua, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PKM Logistics 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fast Track Delivery Inc. : Fast Track Delivery Inc 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOPEV - PEVELY 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SDRAP - RAPID CITY 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pennichuck Water Works, Inc. - Main Office 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Shoe Tree Co 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hampshire Plastics, LLC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE API of NH - Manchester 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAE Systems Electronic Systems NHQ/MEC 1,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern New Hampshire Medical Center 1,737 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Hospital 1,515 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAE Systems Electronic Systems NCA 1,445 FTE
NAT-TCR Longview #051 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 2004-Ucpmc-Dimeo Crp 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hialeah, Fl #00346 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aperion Care Spring Valley 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spring Creek Ranch Management 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Paul Plumbing and Heating Co 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE PRIME Construction Management & Survey, Inc 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Longmont TC LLC 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.