Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New Hampshire

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua

Nashua, NH · ~66 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua runs at 257% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua: 9.8 TCR = 257% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua safety composite

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2018→2024

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua injury rate improved

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua's TCR fell 9.1 from 22.6 in 2018 to 13.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=22.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=13.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Nashua, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 257% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #10/27
  • PHOTO KRE-BSL HUSKY DANVER…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KRE-BSL HUSKY DANVERS OPERATIONS LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bridges by Epoch at Nashua averages 9.8 TCR (257% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua TCR series: 2018=22.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=7 · 2024=13.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Bridges by Epoch at Nashua falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 27 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Hampshire.

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua (66 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bridges by Epoch at Nashua
Bridges by Epoch at Nashua (66 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Bridges by Epoch at Nashua has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.5 11.2 6 0 0
2023 7.0 7.0 3 0 0
2022 8.6 8.6 4 0 0
2021 7.1 7.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 22.6 7.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NH · Nashua

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 179 employers in Nashua, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY DANVERS OPERATIONS LLC 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Forum at Desert Harbor 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Woodbury 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Westpark 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pennichuck Water Works, Inc. - Main Office 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Shoe Tree Co 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hampshire Plastics, LLC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE API of NH - Manchester 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAE Systems Electronic Systems NHQ/MEC 1,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern New Hampshire Medical Center 1,737 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Hospital 1,515 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAE Systems Electronic Systems NCA 1,445 FTE
NAT-TCR The DeRuosi Group LLC 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ramsey Washington Recycling and Energy Center 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 2023 - Ventura 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TNN015 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bridges by Epoch at Andover 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE WILMONT Foods INC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silverado Alexandria - 470 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ontario PDC 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.