Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

MCAM Reading

Reading, PA · ~239 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MCAM Reading runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

MCAM Reading: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MCAM Reading safety composite

MCAM Reading scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MCAM Reading held a steady TCR band

MCAM Reading's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.1 in 2019 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.1 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326130 · Reading, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #6/25
  • PHOTO DaVinci Roofscapes
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~239 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DaVinci Roofscapes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

MCAM Reading in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MCAM Reading averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MCAM Reading TCR series: 2019=1.1 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where MCAM Reading falls in its industry

160 Profile shapes (e.g., plate, r establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 25 Profile shapes (e.g., plate, r employers in Pennsylvania.

MCAM Reading (239 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate MCAM Reading
MCAM Reading (239 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.5

MCAM Reading has more employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.8 3 0 0
2023 3.4 2.6 9 0 0
2022 2.8 1.0 8 0 0
2021 3.0 2.6 7 1 0
2020 4.2 2.3 6 5 0
2019 1.1 0.8 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326130 · PA · Reading

160 Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DaVinci Roofscapes 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FLEXcon KY 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scottsboro 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PTI 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE IT Landes 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE Troegs Brewing Company 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE NVR Building Products (PGH) 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE The AZEK Company - KEYSER AVE 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Carmel 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Corru Kraft Alhambra 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliance Medical Group 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 178 - Cary Nc 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bowman Steel, LLC 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rent The Runway 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenfields of Geneva 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fritz Winter North America, LP 239 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.