Administration building construction · Missouri

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion

St. Louis, MO · ~75 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Administration building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion: 0.4 TCR = 14% of Administration building construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion safety composite

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2019

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion injury rate improved

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion's TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.8 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/122
  • PHOTO CFH Enterprises, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CFH Enterprises, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion averages 0.4 TCR (14% of the Administration building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion TCR series: 2018=0.8 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.9

Where McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion falls in its industry

4,692 Administration building constr establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 122 Administration building constr employers in Missouri.

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion (75 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion
McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion (75 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion has more employees than the Administration building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MO · St. Louis

4,692 Administration building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CFH Enterprises, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR W&J Construction Corp. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Mexico 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ludlow & Associates Construction LLC 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fairway Construction Co., Inc. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Boy's Steel Erection, Inc. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8150 - 1-MAIN 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ag Processing Inc. 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Children's Outpatient-Old Shell 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR GA-Augusta Call Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 9605 SW Nimbus Ave 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Finance and Technology Center (Business Center) 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Michael'S Church 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lampasas Nursing and Rehab Center 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency House 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wuesthoff Medical Center-Rockledge 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.