Low voltage electrical work · California

McMillan Security Systems Inc

San Francisco, CA · ~25 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McMillan Security Systems Inc runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade A.

McMillan Security Systems Inc: 0.7 TCR = 26% of Low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McMillan Security Systems Inc safety composite

McMillan Security Systems Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

McMillan Security Systems Inc held a steady TCR band

McMillan Security Systems Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #47/548
  • PHOTO United Electric Comp…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Electric Company Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

McMillan Security Systems Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McMillan Security Systems Inc averages 0.7 TCR (26% of the Low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McMillan Security Systems Inc TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where McMillan Security Systems Inc falls in its industry

4,550 Low voltage electrical work establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 548 Low voltage electrical work employers in California.

McMillan Security Systems Inc (25 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate McMillan Security Systems Inc
McMillan Security Systems Inc (25 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

McMillan Security Systems Inc has fewer employees than the Low voltage electrical work median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · San Francisco

4,550 Low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Electric Company Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DelSignore Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CALDWELL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR IES Commercial, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Ag Services, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Engineered Materials : Elgin 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Katoen Natie Specialty Chemicals Inc. Pensacola 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - East Norriton 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Aerojet Rocketdyne - Arlington 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 01-03-02 West Div - Rocky Mountain Region 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit Surgery Center 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garrard County 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scott Smith & Son 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.