Administrative courts · Maryland

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County

Name: MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Centreville, MD · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 0.0
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Administrative courts workplace, earning a grade C.

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Administrative courts BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County safety composite

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County held a steady TCR band

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922110 · Centreville, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #0/13
PHOTO Pima County Superior…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pima County Superior Court- APO East (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Pima County Su

0.1
Pima County Su

0.1
State of Wisco

0.1
Courthouse

0.1
This site

0

What this shows MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Administrative courts BLS benchmark).

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County TCR series: 2019=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.2

Where MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County falls in its industry

208 Administrative courts establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 13 Administrative courts employers in Maryland.

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 1.7

MD Judiciary - DC Queen Anne's County has fewer employees than the Administrative courts median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2021	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922110 · MD · Centreville

208 Administrative courts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 20 employers in Centreville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Pima County Superior Court- APO East	TUCSON, AZ	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pima County Superior Court- 110 W Congress	TUCSON, AZ	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	State of Wisconsin Supreme Court	MADISON, WI	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Courthouse	KANKAKEE, IL	0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	St. Charles Energy Center	WALDORF	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CRB Builders, LLC - Rockville Office	ROCKVILLE	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Harbel Inc	CUMBERLAND	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	LCS:LC061 - LC061-Elkridge MD	ELKRIDGE	22 FTE
CITY-NEAR	GTI Maryland, LLC	Centreville	117 FTE
CITY-NEAR	02522 - STORE # 2522 CENTREVILLE	Centreville	97 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Corsica Hills Center	Centreville	94 FTE
CITY-NEAR	5472-000007820	Centreville	88 FTE
NAT-TCR	Gap Inc. - Corporate	San Francisco, CA	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Atlanta - Phipps	Atlanta, GA	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hampton Inn & Suites	Kenosha, WI	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Meijer 208	Lincoln Park, MI	0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Holiday Inn Express Gunnison	Gunnison, CO	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Berger Transfer & Storage, Inc. -Dallas	Fort Worth, TX	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Fort Indiantown Gap	Anneville, PA	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	PrairieLand Partners - Marion	Marion, KS	22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.