Office furniture, modular system, installation · North Carolina

KI High Point, NC Plant

High Point, NC · ~95 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KI High Point, NC Plant runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Office furniture, modular system, installation workplace, earning a grade B.

KI High Point, NC Plant: 2.0 TCR = 71% of Office furniture, modular system, installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KI High Point, NC Plant safety composite

KI High Point, NC Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

KI High Point, NC Plant held a steady TCR band

KI High Point, NC Plant's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.9 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238390 · High Point, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 71% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #3/14
  • PHOTO Manning Materials, Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manning Materials, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

KI High Point, NC Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KI High Point, NC Plant averages 2.0 TCR (71% of the Office furniture, modular system, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KI High Point, NC Plant TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.8

Where KI High Point, NC Plant falls in its industry

403 Office furniture, modular syst establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Office furniture, modular syst employers in North Carolina.

KI High Point, NC Plant (95 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate KI High Point, NC Plant
KI High Point, NC Plant (95 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.1

KI High Point, NC Plant has more employees than the Office furniture, modular system, instal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 9.3 9.3 0 8 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2017 3.5 2.7 3 1 0
2016 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238390 · NC · High Point

403 Office furniture, modular system, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manning Materials, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Restoration Specialties Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building Service Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpha Insulation Atlanta 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Circle S Ranch NC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh North Transmission and Distribution Operations Center 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE MB Haynes Corporation (Office) 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Canyonville Burger King 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR East Coast News NJ 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Springdale Processing 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kerry Ingredients 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cedar Lake Village 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graphic Ink Corp 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE PetroCard Inc Kent 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.