Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Colorado

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder

Boulder, CO · ~92 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder: 3.1 TCR = 95% of Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder safety composite

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder: 2.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2023

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder's TCR rose 2.2 from 2.0 in 2022 to 4.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Boulder, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #14/14
  • PHOTO Teledyne Hastings In…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Teledyne Hastings Instruments (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder averages 3.1 TCR (95% of the Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder TCR series: 2022=2 · 2023=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder falls in its industry

322 Flow instruments, industrial p establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 14 Flow instruments, industrial p employers in Colorado.

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder (92 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder
Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder (92 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Measurement Solutions-DP Flow Boulder has fewer employees than the Flow instruments, industrial process-typ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.2 3.2 2 2 0
2022 2.0 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · CO · Boulder

322 Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 190 employers in Boulder, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Teledyne Hastings Instruments 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paragon Controls Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCoy Global Cedar Park 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Double EE Service, Inc. 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE La Salle Brigade Energy Services 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richmond American Homes of Colorado 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & A ENTERPRISES OF CARBONDALE COLORADO, INC 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE BRANCH - CO - Denver 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boulder Campus 1,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothills Campus 1,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Measurement Solutions-Boulder Flow 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flow Measurement Products 711 FTE
NAT-TCR West Glacier Property 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Agilyx Corporation 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #0916 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ACPHS Res Dining 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pretium Packaging - Carrollton 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency Hermiston Nursing and Rehabilitation 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE AFC - Gary 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barbeque Wood Flavors, Inc. 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.