Bottles, plastics, manufacturing · Texas

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton

Carrollton, TX · ~92 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bottles, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton safety composite

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton held a steady TCR band

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.0 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326160 · Carrollton, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #15/28
  • PHOTO Logoplaste, Kansas C…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Logoplaste, Kansas City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pretium Packaging - Carrollton averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Pretium Packaging - Carrollton falls in its industry

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 28 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi employers in Texas.

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton (92 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pretium Packaging - Carrollton
Pretium Packaging - Carrollton (92 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Pretium Packaging - Carrollton has more employees than the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2020 4.1 3.3 5 0 0
2019 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2018 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326160 · TX · Carrollton

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 331 employers in Carrollton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Logoplaste, Kansas City 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Axium Chicago 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plastipak-Victorville 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Altium Packaging - Zephyrhills 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pecos 341 CR 402, Pecos, TX 79772 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Spread Center 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ft Worth Transmission 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Maintenance 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4263-35281 2,390 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Brandt Companies, LLC 2,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elite Line Services - Amazon Account 1,669 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Carrollton 1,520 FTE
NAT-TCR Unit #1900 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Wilmington College 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #4035 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fiber Energy Products 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE AFC - Gary 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Cincinnati 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE MN Women's Care-Maplewood 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #924 (ALBERTSONS MARKET) 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.