Skilled nursing facilities · Michigan

Medilodge of Frankenmuth

Frankenmuth, MI · ~88 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Medilodge of Frankenmuth runs at 286% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Medilodge of Frankenmuth: 18.6 TCR = 286% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Medilodge of Frankenmuth safety composite

Medilodge of Frankenmuth scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−34.2

2016→2024

Medilodge of Frankenmuth injury rate improved

Medilodge of Frankenmuth's TCR fell 34.2 from 39.8 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 58.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=39.8 · 2017=24.4 · 2018=58.1 · 2019=40.3 · 2020=24.5 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Frankenmuth, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.6 · 286% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #441/471
  • PHOTO Vista Park Health an…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vista Park Health and Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Medilodge of Frankenmuth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Medilodge of Frankenmuth averages 18.6 TCR (286% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Medilodge of Frankenmuth TCR series: 2016=39.8 · 2017=24.4 · 2018=58.1 · 2019=40.3 · 2020=24.5 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Medilodge of Frankenmuth falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #441 safest of 471 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Michigan.

Medilodge of Frankenmuth (88 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Medilodge of Frankenmuth
Medilodge of Frankenmuth (88 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Medilodge of Frankenmuth has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 3.8 3 0 0
2023 6.1 6.1 3 0 0
2022 5.7 5.7 3 0 0
2021 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 24.5 20.4 5 7 0
2019 40.3 23.4 18 1 0
2018 58.1 17.9 14 12 0
2017 24.4 19.0 9 0 0
2016 39.8 37.0 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Frankenmuth

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 20 employers in Frankenmuth, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vista Park Health and Rehabilitation 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond Heights Place 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twin Maples Health Care Facility 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aperion Care Bridgeport 18.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fluresh Adrian 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water UEDCD 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Industries, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE BIDIGARE CONTRACTORS, INC. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zehnder's of Frankenmuth 862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bronner's Christmas Wonderland 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bavarian Inn Lodge 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR 018-00436 127 FTE
NAT-TCR Lloyd Lumber 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Services Group - Cimarron 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lasc Admin 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 479511-MEM-FRAYSER 18.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hughesparker Ind. LLC Plant #1 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lebanon Distribution Center 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bomco 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE FoodTown #207 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.