Building materials supply dealers · Minnesota

Lloyd Lumber

North Mankato, MN · ~54 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lloyd Lumber runs at 547% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building materials supply dealers workplace, earning a grade F.

Lloyd Lumber: 18.6 TCR = 547% of Building materials supply dealers BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lloyd Lumber safety composite

Lloyd Lumber scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.6

2017→2024

Lloyd Lumber injury rate improved

Lloyd Lumber's TCR fell 17.6 from 29.8 in 2017 to 12.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 29.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=29.8 · 2018=21.4 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=29.5 · 2022=20.0 · 2023=14.0 · 2024=12.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444190 · North Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.6 · 547% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #31/32
  • PHOTO McCoys Building Supp…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 76 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McCoys Building Supply-Longview (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Lloyd Lumber in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lloyd Lumber averages 18.6 TCR (547% of the Building materials supply dealers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lloyd Lumber TCR series: 2017=29.8 · 2018=21.4 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=29.5 · 2022=20 · 2023=14 · 2024=12.2 · BLS 3.4

Where Lloyd Lumber falls in its industry

1,643 Building materials supply deal establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 32 Building materials supply deal employers in Minnesota.

Lloyd Lumber (54 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lloyd Lumber
Lloyd Lumber (54 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Lloyd Lumber has more employees than the Building materials supply dealers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.2 8.1 6 0 0
2023 14.0 4.0 7 0 0
2022 20.0 7.3 11 0 0
2021 29.5 17.4 17 0 0
2020 11.3 1.9 6 0 0
2019 10.7 2.1 5 0 0
2018 21.4 8.6 10 0 0
2017 29.8 12.8 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444190 · MN · North Mankato

1,643 Building materials supply dealers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 57 employers in North Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McCoys Building Supply-Longview 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCoys Building Supply-Belton 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCoys Building Supply - Gonzales 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7101 L& W Supply 18.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Center 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 09 Eveleth 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elder-Jones Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haldeman Homme, Inc. - Minneapolis - Corporate 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUN.com Inc 776 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Occasions Group Inc. - 0156-MNNO3 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Occasions Group - MN - 0156 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Graphics Commercial - 0027-MNNO10 349 FTE
NAT-TCR Medilodge of Frankenmuth 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Services Group - Cimarron 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lasc Admin 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 479511-MEM-FRAYSER 18.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pwr LLC 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodland Elementary School 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE DiSabatino Construction Company 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE RTNC, Inc. dba Rector Nursing and Rehab 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.