Skilled nursing facilities · Michigan

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant

Mt. Pleasant, MI · ~78 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant: 9.7 TCR = 148% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant safety composite

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2016→2024

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant injury rate improved

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant's TCR fell 11.5 from 15.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 60.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=16.3 · 2020=60.5 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=18.4 · 2023=17.7 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Mt. Pleasant, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.7 · 148% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #304/471
  • PHOTO LP Cookeville, LLC--…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LP Cookeville, LLC--Putnam (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant averages 9.7 TCR (148% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant TCR series: 2016=15 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=16.3 · 2020=60.5 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=18.4 · 2023=17.7 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #304 safest of 471 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Michigan.

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant (78 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant
Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant (78 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 0.0 2 0 0
2023 17.7 7.9 9 0 0
2022 18.4 10.2 9 0 0
2021 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2020 60.5 58.6 6 25 0
2019 16.3 7.2 8 1 0
2018 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 15.0 15.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Mt. Pleasant

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 42 employers in Mt. Pleasant, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LP Cookeville, LLC--Putnam 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wooded Glen 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stonebridge Place Assisted Living 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clinton Hickman County Hospital, Inc. 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henry Mast Greenhouses Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Joseph Office and Service Center 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signal Restoration USA 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Enclosure Company, LLC 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort 2,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Central Michigan 582 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delfield 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR J Ranck Electric, Inc. 298 FTE
NAT-TCR LP Cookeville, LLC--Putnam 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Prairie State Plumbing & Heating Inc 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Germantown Egg Farm 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Enercept 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Price Brothers, Inc. - North 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Billings Clinic West 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Refrigerated Pleasant Prairie, LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Walls Inc-Wilmington 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.