Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors · Minnesota

Medina Electric LLC

Hamel, MN · ~150 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Medina Electric LLC runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Medina Electric LLC: 4.6 TCR = 164% of Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Medina Electric LLC safety composite

Medina Electric LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Medina Electric LLC: 3.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2024

Medina Electric LLC's TCR rose 1.7 from 3.0 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Hamel, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 164% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #76/100
  • PHOTO Sun Electric Company…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sun Electric Company of TN Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Medina Electric LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Medina Electric LLC averages 4.6 TCR (164% of the Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Medina Electric LLC TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Medina Electric LLC falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical Contractors and Oth establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 100 Electrical Contractors and Oth employers in Minnesota.

Medina Electric LLC (150 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Medina Electric LLC
Medina Electric LLC (150 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Medina Electric LLC has more employees than the Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 2.4 4 0 0
2023 3.1 1.5 4 0 0
2022 6.6 0.0 5 0 0
2021 8.1 5.1 8 0 0
2020 5.5 3.7 6 0 0
2019 2.8 0.0 5 0 0
2018 2.8 0.9 6 0 0
2017 3.0 0.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · MN · Hamel

4,550 Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 11 employers in Hamel, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sun Electric Company of TN Inc 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Electrical Contractors Klamath Falls 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7374_16988 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Control Solutions Northwest Inc 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Office 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gresser Companies, Inc 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE TurbinePROs Main Office 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE D16 Minneapolis 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loram Fleet/Operations 590 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loram Maintenance of Way (Fleet Operations) 515 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loram Maintenance of Way (Corporate Office) 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate/Shop 392 FTE
NAT-TCR WINDSOR 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmony Castings, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Russ Milne Ford Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Saver Group,Inc dba Lancaster Save-A-Lot 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Comet Electric Inc 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ruby Wines Inc 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harbec 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berry Global 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.