Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · California

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc.

Simi Valley, CA · ~563 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 88% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. safety composite

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2022

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.7 from 2.3 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2018=4.8 · 2022=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Simi Valley, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #58/104
  • PHOTO AeroControlex
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~563 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AeroControlex (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2018=4.8 · 2022=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 104 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in California.

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. (563 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc.
Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. (563 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.7 0.8 9 1 0
2018 4.8 4.1 26 2 0
2016 2.3 2.1 11 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CA · Simi Valley

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 139 employers in Simi Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AeroControlex 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sensenich Propeller Co 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Triumph Group Precision Components Fort Worth 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ducommun Gardena 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blue Mountain Enterprise 563 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 563 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - CULVER CITY 563 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zoetis (Formerly Abaxis) 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHSV001 - HOSPITAL 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Simi Valley 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milgard Manufacturing Simi Valley CA 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milgard Windows & Doors 497 FTE
NAT-TCR Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1470 - Plymouth 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1247 - Kendall 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1200 - Spanish Fort 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ulta Beauty (822 - Chambersburg Distribution Center) 563 FTE
NAT-SIZE Granite City Plant 563 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyundai Transys Georgia Seating System, LLC 563 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona Department of Administration 563 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.