Clutches and clutch discs, asbestos, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc

Mequon, WI · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Clutches and clutch discs, asbestos, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc: 2.9 TCR = 54% of Clutches and clutch discs, asbestos, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc safety composite

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc held a steady TCR band

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.9 in 2020 to 1.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.9 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Mequon, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 54% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO Continental Automotive
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Continental Automotive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc averages 2.9 TCR (54% of the Clutches and clutch discs, asbestos, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc TCR series: 2020=1.9 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=1.8 · BLS 5.4

Where Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc falls in its industry

320 Clutches and clutch discs, asb establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Clutches and clutch discs, asb employers in Wisconsin.

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc (66 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc
Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc (66 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc has fewer employees than the Clutches and clutch discs, asbestos, man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2021 5.1 0.0 3 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · WI · Mequon

320 Clutches and clutch discs, asbestos, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 56 employers in Mequon, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Continental Automotive 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinson Plant 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jasper Weller, LLC - DBA Weller Truck Parts 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honda Transmission Mfg - Georgia Campus 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Okray Family Farms, Inc 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tidy View Dairy, LLC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wysocki Produce Farm - Paramount Ag 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3757_10365 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Automation- Mequon WI (MEQ) 1,137 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIMIL8 622 FTE
CITY-NEAR WIMIL8 ASCENSION COLUMBIA ST MARYS HOSP OZAUKEE 528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silgan Specialty Packaging 263 FTE
NAT-TCR Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Plastic Molding Technology, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1470 - Plymouth 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1247 - Kendall 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Embassy Suites Cleveland Beachwood 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chalet of Niles 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diamond Antenna and Microwave 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beckwith Electronic Engineering Co. 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.