Vibration meters, analyzers, and calibrators, manufacturing · California

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County

Irvine, CA · ~322 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Vibration meters, analyzers, and calibrators, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Vibration meters, analyzers, and calibrators, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County safety composite

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County: 0.9 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.25× in 2018

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.9 in 2017 to 1.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Irvine, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #4/12
  • PHOTO NY56 AMETEK POWER …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~322 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NY56 AMETEK POWER DATA SYSTEMS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Vibration meters, analyzers, and calibrators, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2018=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County falls in its industry

128 Vibration meters, analyzers, a establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 12 Vibration meters, analyzers, a employers in California.

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County (322 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County
Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County (322 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Meggitt Sensing Systems Orange County has more employees than the Vibration meters, analyzers, and calibra median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.5 0.3 4 1 0
2017 0.9 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · CA · Irvine

128 Vibration meters, analyzers, and calibrators, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 622 employers in Irvine, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NY56 AMETEK POWER DATA SYSTEMS 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MA121 TMC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waygate Technologies - Skaneateles 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virginia Panel Corporation 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Main 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perfect 85C 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE Procter & Gamble Paper Products - Oxnard, CA 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE NuSil Technology, Carpinteria 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine 16,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-10 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Lifesciences 4,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson MDD CSS Irvine 3,775 FTE
NAT-TCR Mechanical Contractors Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Space Systems Group Gilbert 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt & Whitney Autoair, Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Westbrook Dental Lab 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : Newington, CT (DC) 322 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grady-White Boats, Inc. 322 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-48180050-11101 Smitty Lane-Wc 322 FTE
NAT-SIZE GNBPNCMT 322 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.