Social organizations, civic and fraternal · Colorado

Memorial Park Recreation Center

Colorado Springs, CO · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Memorial Park Recreation Center runs at 721% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Social organizations, civic and fraternal workplace, earning a grade F.

Memorial Park Recreation Center: 15.1 TCR = 721% of Social organizations, civic and fraternal BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Memorial Park Recreation Center safety composite

Memorial Park Recreation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Memorial Park Recreation Center: 35.5 → 60.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 60.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Memorial Park Recreation Center's TCR rose 24.7 from 35.5 in 2017 to 60.2 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813410 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 721% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/21
  • PHOTO Hilltop YMCA
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hilltop YMCA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Memorial Park Recreation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Memorial Park Recreation Center averages 15.1 TCR (721% of the Social organizations, civic and fraternal BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Memorial Park Recreation Center TCR series: 2017=35.5 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=60.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Memorial Park Recreation Center falls in its industry

298 Social organizations, civic an establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 21 Social organizations, civic an employers in Colorado.

Memorial Park Recreation Center (27 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Memorial Park Recreation Center
Memorial Park Recreation Center (27 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Memorial Park Recreation Center has fewer employees than the Social organizations, civic and fraterna median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 60.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 35.5 26.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813410 · CO · Colorado Springs

298 Social organizations, civic and fraternal employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hilltop YMCA 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garden Ranch Family Center 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Briargate Family Center 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cordera Community Center 15.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Colorado City 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Agricultural Management, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bohler Well Service LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE white river electric associaiton 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Pederson Point Plant 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Arbor Place 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR California Correctional Health Care Services (091) Southern Region 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wingfield Health Care LLC 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morris Publishing Group LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Equipment and Welding 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashboro Village 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fosters Heating & AC, Inc. 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.