corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon

Ruffs Dale, PA · ~185 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon: 2.7 TCR = 82% of corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon safety composite

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon: 2.2 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon's TCR rose 1.0 from 2.2 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Ruffs Dale, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #33/81
  • PHOTO Pro-Pak Industries
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~185 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pro-Pak Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon falls in its industry

1,338 corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 81 corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Pennsylvania.

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon (185 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon
Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon (185 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon has more employees than the corrugated and solid fiber box manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 1.6 4 2 0
2023 3.8 2.7 6 1 0
2022 4.4 3.3 8 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2020 5.9 2.9 6 4 0
2019 1.6 1.1 3 0 0
2018 2.2 0.5 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.2 1.1 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · PA · Ruffs Dale

1,338 corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 5 employers in Ruffs Dale, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pro-Pak Industries 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Opus Packaging - Jackson 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Packaging, Golden Valley 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sumter Packaging Corporation 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BETTER BAKED FOODS/ERIE 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE George E Ritchey 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE PGH 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pleasant Valley Homes, Inc. 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR AmeriGas - ACE - Ruffs Dales, Pa 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR AmeriGas- ACE - Ruffs Dale, PA 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR AmeriGas- ACE - Ruffs Dale 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR T R Trucking & Excavating, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlas Manufacturing, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkots 318 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gabriel Building Supply 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvard Maintenance Inc of Minnesotta 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tennsco Plant 2 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Qorvo - 7914 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anchorage 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knoxville KNX 1 185 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.