Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · South Carolina

Sumter Packaging Corporation

Sumter, SC · ~138 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sumter Packaging Corporation runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Sumter Packaging Corporation: 2.7 TCR = 82% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sumter Packaging Corporation safety composite

Sumter Packaging Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2022→2023

Sumter Packaging Corporation injury rate improved

Sumter Packaging Corporation's TCR fell 3.9 from 4.6 in 2022 to 0.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.6 · 2023=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Sumter, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/23
  • PHOTO 4623 SPB Ohio
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4623 SPB Ohio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sumter Packaging Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sumter Packaging Corporation averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sumter Packaging Corporation TCR series: 2022=4.6 · 2023=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Sumter Packaging Corporation falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 23 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in South Carolina.

Sumter Packaging Corporation (138 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Sumter Packaging Corporation
Sumter Packaging Corporation (138 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Sumter Packaging Corporation has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.6 3.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · SC · Sumter

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 130 employers in Sumter, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4623 SPB Ohio 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Yukon 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pro-Pak Industries 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Opus Packaging - Jackson 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern MEP, Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mankiewicz Coatings LLC 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mclaughlin Body Co. Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1120 LOWE S OF FLORENCE SC 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Construction Group 2,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Tuomey 1,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumter Utilities, Inc. 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental Tire the Americas LLC - Sumter Plant 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Engineering-Council Bluffs 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Improved Piping Products, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR makowski's real sausage company 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kearney County Health Services 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE RLH Fire Protection 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nappa Home Office 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manor at Elfindale 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Micronutrients USA, LLC 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.