Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) · Wisconsin

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer

Menasha, WI · ~228 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) workplace, earning a grade D.

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer: 5.6 TCR = 169% of Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer safety composite

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2017

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer injury rate improved

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer's TCR fell 0.7 from 5.9 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322121 · Menasha, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 169% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #38/41
  • PHOTO miller recycling cor…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: miller recycling corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Menasha Tissue Manufacturer averages 5.6 TCR (169% of the Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Menasha Tissue Manufacturer falls in its industry

317 Paper mills (except newsprint, establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 41 Paper mills (except newsprint, employers in Wisconsin.

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer (228 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Menasha Tissue Manufacturer
Menasha Tissue Manufacturer (228 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Menasha Tissue Manufacturer has more employees than the Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 5.2 1.7 7 5 0
2016 5.9 3.4 12 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322121 · WI · Menasha

317 Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 55 employers in Menasha, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR miller recycling corporation 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seaman Paper Company Paper Mill 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flagstaff Paper Manufacturing Facility 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omniafiltra LLC 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Krueger International Bonduel Plant 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pan-O-Gold Baking Company-Sun Prairie, WI 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weather Shield Mfg Inc. ---Millwork Plant 02 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whiting Mill 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faith Technologies 2,712 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSC Communications Menasha Print 462 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Book Company - Menasha 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transcontinental Packaging Menasha 280 FTE
NAT-TCR CC014 - West Bay Project-Northern CA 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Thornburg (Patho) 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Centerville (Incen) 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kedplasma - Buffalo 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aperion Care Arbors at Michigan City 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fife Building (Wafif) 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Easton Hib (Paeto) 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Provisur Technologies Mokena 228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.