Farm labor contractors · California

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc.

Madera, CA · ~53 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Farm labor contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc.: 14.6 TCR = 324% of Farm labor contractors BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. safety composite

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 30% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−36.8

2017→2024

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. injury rate improved

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc.'s TCR fell 36.8 from 40.7 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 40.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=40.7 · 2018=28.5 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=14.4 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Madera, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 324% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #594/620
  • PHOTO Dynapac Harvesting, …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. averages 14.6 TCR (324% of the Farm labor contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. TCR series: 2017=40.7 · 2018=28.5 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=14.4 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. falls in its industry

836 Farm labor contractors establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #594 safest of 620 Farm labor contractors employers in California.

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc.
Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. has fewer employees than the Farm labor contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 3 0 0
2022 2.3 1.5 3 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2020 14.4 11.2 7 2 1
2019 18.9 7.5 10 0 0
2018 28.5 28.5 9 4 0
2017 40.7 21.5 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Madera

836 Farm labor contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 162 employers in Madera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farm Hands Leasing 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kumbaya Farms - Pajaro Valley 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR I.S.A. CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRC LABOR SERVICES INC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acemi Nursery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ball Tagawa Growers 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Farm Management Inc 17,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroff Ag Services Inc 2,253 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 170 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Madera 1,393 FTE
NAT-TCR United Enterprises, Inc 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wastewater - Housatonic 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GARDALL 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Whaley Foodservice-Charlotte 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Baltimore 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harkraft, Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 14 - Salt Lake City 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1014 - Wausau 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.