Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA)

Salinas, CA · ~108 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade F.

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA): 14.6 TCR = 324% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) safety composite

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA): 8.1 → 9.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 35.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2024

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA)'s TCR rose 1.0 from 8.1 in 2018 to 9.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 35.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Salinas, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 324% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #593/620
  • PHOTO Mendoza Farm Labor C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 74 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) averages 14.6 TCR (324% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) TCR series: 2018=8.1 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=20.4 · 2021=13.1 · 2022=35.5 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=9.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #593 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) (108 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA)
Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) (108 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (CA) has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.1 8.3 11 0 0
2023 7.4 5.8 9 0 0
2022 35.5 16.3 12 12 0
2021 13.1 11.1 12 1 0
2020 20.4 3.4 8 16 0
2019 8.4 6.3 11 1 0
2018 8.1 4.7 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Salinas

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 337 employers in Salinas, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mendoza Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farm Hands Leasing 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kumbaya Farms - Pajaro Valley 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR I.S.A. CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jazmine Ag Labor Services, Inc 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Farms Inc 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Cattle Feeders, LLC 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rainbow Farms 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing 8,854 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing-California 3,255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital 2,197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salinas Valley Healthcare System 2,133 FTE
NAT-TCR Tower Metal Works, Inc. 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TMF Center 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale River Valley Tualatin 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Crystal Springs Inc. 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #38 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trees LLC 495 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cullman Electric Cooperative 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE C506 Conway 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.