Materials recovery facility construction · New Jersey

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc.

Trenton (Trenton City), NJ · ~68 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Materials recovery facility construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc.: 9.1 TCR = 313% of Materials recovery facility construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. safety composite

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2022→2023

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. injury rate improved

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 9.3 in 2022 to 8.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=9.3 · 2023=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Trenton (Trenton City), NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 313% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO Forma Automotive
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forma Automotive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. averages 9.1 TCR (313% of the Materials recovery facility construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. TCR series: 2022=9.3 · 2023=8.8 · BLS 2.9

Where Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. falls in its industry

924 Materials recovery facility co establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Materials recovery facility co employers in New Jersey.

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. (68 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc.
Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. (68 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. has fewer employees than the Materials recovery facility construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.8 6.3 7 0 0
2022 9.3 4.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · NJ · Trenton (Trenton City)

924 Materials recovery facility construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forma Automotive 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Felderman Management Corp 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Younger Brothers Door & Trim LLC 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Warrens LLC 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care New Jersey LLC.-Vineland 1 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lambertville 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Terminal Development 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE ANSELMI & DECICCO, INC. 68 FTE
NAT-TCR OrePac Building Products - Ontario 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Zona 6 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 5940 - Charlotte 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clackamas Store 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - McKinney 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4218/3239 - Plano Crossdock 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE L&S Electric, Inc. South 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.