Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers · California

OrePac Building Products - Ontario

Ontario, CA · ~120 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

OrePac Building Products - Ontario runs at 413% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

OrePac Building Products - Ontario: 9.1 TCR = 413% of Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

OrePac Building Products - Ontario safety composite

OrePac Building Products - Ontario scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2021→2023

OrePac Building Products - Ontario injury rate improved

OrePac Building Products - Ontario's TCR fell 3.3 from 5.6 in 2021 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 19.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.6 · 2022=19.3 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 413% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #82/96
  • PHOTO Rocky Top Knoxville
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rocky Top Knoxville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

OrePac Building Products - Ontario in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows OrePac Building Products - Ontario averages 9.1 TCR (413% of the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

OrePac Building Products - Ontario TCR series: 2021=5.6 · 2022=19.3 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 2.2

Where OrePac Building Products - Ontario falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 96 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe employers in California.

OrePac Building Products - Ontario (120 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate OrePac Building Products - Ontario
OrePac Building Products - Ontario (120 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

OrePac Building Products - Ontario has more employees than the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2022 19.3 18.6 5 22 0
2021 5.6 3.2 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · CA · Ontario

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rocky Top Knoxville 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodson Lumber & Hardware, Inc. - Bryan 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8153 DULUTH DIST CENTER MILLWORK GA 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5801 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spreckels 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE VF - Healdsburg 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ito Brothers Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Citrus 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Zona 6 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 5940 - Charlotte 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clackamas Store 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas Metal Parts 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northern Dutchess Residential 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cbs Mechanical Inc 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cenveo Worldwide Limited Indianapolis 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntley Brothers Co. Inc. 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.