Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Arizona

Mercury Logistics LLC

Chandler, AZ · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mercury Logistics LLC runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Mercury Logistics LLC: 6.1 TCR = 94% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mercury Logistics LLC safety composite

Mercury Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 5.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mercury Logistics LLC: 2.8 → 10.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2024

Mercury Logistics LLC's TCR rose 8.2 from 2.8 in 2021 to 10.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Chandler, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.1 · 94% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #41/130
  • PHOTO ILJAC - JACKSONVILLE
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ILJAC - JACKSONVILLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Mercury Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mercury Logistics LLC averages 6.1 TCR (94% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mercury Logistics LLC TCR series: 2021=2.8 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=10.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Mercury Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 130 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Arizona.

Mercury Logistics LLC (48 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Mercury Logistics LLC
Mercury Logistics LLC (48 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Mercury Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.9 5.5 4 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · AZ · Chandler

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ILJAC - JACKSONVILLE 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 21600 MELROSE AVE 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 201660000 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 727 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJAZ Construction, LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vastco, Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE RRSC Phoenix 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rikoshea Contracting Inc. 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR DS Pipe and Steel 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Coastal Greenhouses, LLC -NY 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - AGS2 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwick Wild Animal Farm Inc 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ucp - Tla 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dixieland 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE UCP-PH 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard by Marriott - Petoskey 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.