General medical and surgical hospitals · Massachusetts

Mercy Medical Center

Springfield, MA · ~1,501 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mercy Medical Center runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade B.

Mercy Medical Center: 5.7 TCR = 76% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mercy Medical Center safety composite

Mercy Medical Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mercy Medical Center: 5.9 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2022

Mercy Medical Center's TCR rose 0.6 from 5.9 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Springfield, MA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 5.7 · 76% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #52/87
  • PHOTO Suburban Hospital
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 370 inj
  • SIZE ~1,501 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Suburban Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Mercy Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mercy Medical Center averages 5.7 TCR (76% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mercy Medical Center TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=6.5 · BLS 7.5

Where Mercy Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 87 General medical and surgical h employers in Massachusetts.

Mercy Medical Center (1,501 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mercy Medical Center
Mercy Medical Center (1,501 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Mercy Medical Center has more employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.5 2.9 53 7 0
2021 5.3 2.7 48 3 0
2020 8.7 4.5 53 21 0
2019 5.1 2.1 53 2 0
2018 5.1 2.0 61 0 0
2017 3.6 1.8 39 3 0
2016 5.9 3.2 63 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MA · Springfield

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 215 employers in Springfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Suburban Hospital 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartwood 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southdale Medical Center 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ILARL213 ASCENSION MERCY MEDICAL CENTER AURORA 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 804 Woburn St. Wilmington, MA 1,511 FTE
STATE-SIZE NBC Operating, LP 1,483 FTE
STATE-SIZE COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL 1,525 FTE
STATE-SIZE HMH Boston 1,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMC - Baystate Medical Center 8,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMP - Baystate Medical Practices 1,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Tarp Redevelopment, LLC d/b/a MGM Springfield 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMF - Baystate Medical Practices 1,746 FTE
NAT-TCR Lasseter Tractor Company Inc 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Providence at Home 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Polymers Inc. - Syntech Plant 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lunds & Byerlys, Glen Lake 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1855-WIMIL32 1,501 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ecolab Global Headquarters - St. Paul MN 1,501 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATLR3~Corporate Headquarters 1,501 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Gilbert 1,500 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.