Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers · Ohio

Metal Coaters of Cambridge

Cambridge, OH · ~108 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metal Coaters of Cambridge runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers workplace, earning a grade B.

Metal Coaters of Cambridge: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metal Coaters of Cambridge safety composite

Metal Coaters of Cambridge scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metal Coaters of Cambridge: 2.6 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2018

Metal Coaters of Cambridge's TCR rose 0.4 from 2.6 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Cambridge, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #20/52
  • PHOTO Modineer Plant 3
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Modineer Plant 3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Metal Coaters of Cambridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metal Coaters of Cambridge averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metal Coaters of Cambridge TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Metal Coaters of Cambridge falls in its industry

646 Metal Coating, Engraving (exce establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 52 Metal Coating, Engraving (exce employers in Ohio.

Metal Coaters of Cambridge (108 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Metal Coaters of Cambridge
Metal Coaters of Cambridge (108 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Metal Coaters of Cambridge has more employees than the Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.1 2.0 3 0 0
2017 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 2.6 2.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · OH · Cambridge

646 Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 73 employers in Cambridge, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Modineer Plant 3 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Himed 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Wayne - CR 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kronis Coatings 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Egg Processing 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaRoche Tree Service, Inc. 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mielke Ohio 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decko Products, LLC 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeastern Ohio Regional Medical Center. 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3816-SI3778 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3262 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quanex IG Systems Cambridge 351 FTE
NAT-TCR Heritage Health - Beardstown 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Penske : 4544-00 PPG/Fairburn, GA 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MPS Indianapolis 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Tenet Doctors White Rock Evs 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-ORF-NORFOLK-PD 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reunion SNF, LP D/B/A Reunion Plaza 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Vincent de Paul Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penske : 5235-00 Starbucks-DCC/Grand Prairie, TX 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.