Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · Alabama

Metal Tank Manufacturing

Mobile, AL · ~78 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metal Tank Manufacturing runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Metal Tank Manufacturing: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metal Tank Manufacturing safety composite

Metal Tank Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Metal Tank Manufacturing injury rate improved

Metal Tank Manufacturing's TCR fell 2.1 from 4.6 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332420 · Mobile, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Worthington Cylinder…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Worthington Cylinders Westerville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Metal Tank Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metal Tank Manufacturing averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metal Tank Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Metal Tank Manufacturing falls in its industry

355 Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manu establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manu employers in Alabama.

Metal Tank Manufacturing (78 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metal Tank Manufacturing
Metal Tank Manufacturing (78 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Metal Tank Manufacturing has more employees than the Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 3 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2019 1.3 0.0 0 1 0
2018 2.5 1.2 2 0 0
2017 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2016 4.6 2.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332420 · AL · Mobile

355 Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 505 employers in Mobile, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Worthington Cylinders Westerville 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR StrongFab Headquarters 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ConeCraft, LLC. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rhodes Manufacturing LLC. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Division Montgomery Crew Headquarters 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tuscaloosa Snow Mills Complex - APC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ascend Performance Materials Decatur AL 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hellas Fibers 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Austal USA LLC 3,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE INFIRMARY 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hargrove Engineers and Constructors 1,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Great Eastern Resort Corporation - Massanutten Sales Staff 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MANUF 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Plastipak- Havre de Grace 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amber Oaks Assisted Living 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Milani Construction, LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Heights Bulverde 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crossville 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muskegon Charter Township 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.