Bottles, plastics, manufacturing · Maryland

Plastipak- Havre de Grace

Havre De Grace, MD · ~187 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plastipak- Havre de Grace runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bottles, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Plastipak- Havre de Grace: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plastipak- Havre de Grace safety composite

Plastipak- Havre de Grace scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2024

Plastipak- Havre de Grace injury rate improved

Plastipak- Havre de Grace's TCR fell 2.4 from 5.1 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.1 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326160 · Havre De Grace, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Pretium Packaging - …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~187 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pretium Packaging - Leipsic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Plastipak- Havre de Grace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plastipak- Havre de Grace averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plastipak- Havre de Grace TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Plastipak- Havre de Grace falls in its industry

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi employers in Maryland.

Plastipak- Havre de Grace (187 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plastipak- Havre de Grace
Plastipak- Havre de Grace (187 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Plastipak- Havre de Grace has more employees than the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 1.6 4 1 0
2023 3.0 2.5 6 0 0
2022 2.2 0.9 2 3 0
2021 3.7 1.9 8 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 7 0 0
2017 5.1 4.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326160 · MD · Havre De Grace

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 18 employers in Havre De Grace, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pretium Packaging - Leipsic 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pretium Packaging - Anaheim 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amcor Rigid Packaging Tumwater 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Racine 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Singleton Electric Company, Inc. 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCM Services 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE L3Harris Technologies Inc-Millersville 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0223 LOWE S OF GAITHERSBURG MD. 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR B47 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Syensqo (Formerly Solvay) 271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Citizens Care & Rehabilitation Center 202 FTE
NAT-TCR Amber Oaks Assisted Living 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MANUF 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Castlerock Development 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #27 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE McClone Construction (Sacramento) 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pathway Services Unlimited, Inc. 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ulterra Drilling Technologies, LP 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mi-Jack Products 187 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.