325992 Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, Chemical, and Copy Toner Manufacturing · Ohio

Metalphoto of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, OH · ~37 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metalphoto of Cincinnati runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical 325992 Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, Chemical, and Copy Toner Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Metalphoto of Cincinnati: 0.7 TCR = 21% of 325992 Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, Chemical, and Copy Toner Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metalphoto of Cincinnati safety composite

Metalphoto of Cincinnati scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metalphoto of Cincinnati: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Metalphoto of Cincinnati's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2020 to 2.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325992 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Horizons, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Horizons, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Metalphoto of Cincinnati in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metalphoto of Cincinnati averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the 325992 Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, Chemical, and Copy Toner Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metalphoto of Cincinnati TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Metalphoto of Cincinnati falls in its industry

68 325992 Photographic Film, Pape establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 325992 Photographic Film, Pape employers in Ohio.

Metalphoto of Cincinnati (37 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Metalphoto of Cincinnati
Metalphoto of Cincinnati (37 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Metalphoto of Cincinnati has fewer employees than the 325992 Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325992 · OH · Cincinnati

68 325992 Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, Chemical, and Copy Toner Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Horizons, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Mountain Imaging - Concord NH 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1915-7063 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Agfa Corporation Branchburg 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biosecurity Building 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus SW Svc Ctr 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lead Building Company LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unified Restoration Systems, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Hackney Ladish INC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Amcor Rigid Plastics 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Walter Kidde Portable Equipment (Colorado Springs) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arconic 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Andry Rasmussen & Sons 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinnacle Piping and Service Corp 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Middlesex Gases & Technologies, Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vaughn Contractors Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.