Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

Metro Metals Corporation

Saint Paul, MN · ~49 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metro Metals Corporation runs at 695% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Metro Metals Corporation: 15.3 TCR = 695% of Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metro Metals Corporation safety composite

Metro Metals Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2017→2022

Metro Metals Corporation injury rate improved

Metro Metals Corporation's TCR fell 4.6 from 17.0 in 2017 to 12.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.0 · 2018=15.5 · 2019=12.8 · 2021=18.6 · 2022=12.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Saint Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.3 · 695% of ind

  • DART 12.4 DART
  • RANK #15/15
  • PHOTO AMG Resources - Whee…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AMG Resources - Wheeling, WV (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Metro Metals Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metro Metals Corporation averages 15.3 TCR (695% of the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metro Metals Corporation TCR series: 2017=17 · 2018=15.5 · 2019=12.8 · 2021=18.6 · 2022=12.4 · BLS 2.2

Where Metro Metals Corporation falls in its industry

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 15 Metal scrap and waste merchant employers in Minnesota.

Metro Metals Corporation (49 employees, TCR 15.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Metro Metals Corporation
Metro Metals Corporation (49 employees, TCR 15.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Metro Metals Corporation has more employees than the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesale median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 12.4 12.4 4 0 0
2021 18.6 15.5 5 1 0
2019 12.8 12.8 6 0 0
2018 15.5 8.9 6 1 0
2017 17.0 9.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · MN · Saint Paul

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AMG Resources - Wheeling, WV 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pickers Longview, LLC 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rochester Iron and Metal, Inc. 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEL Port Orange 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Impact Power Solutions 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lodermeier's Inc 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glass & Mirror Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Building Systems, Ltd 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule 1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Josephs Hospital 1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1624 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bobcat Doosan Gwinner 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 055521-Oak-Airport Sta 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Charleston Airport - 15190 15.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Market-Dallas 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE M7696 Delta Regiona 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holt and Bugbee Hardwoods 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bshsi Mary Immacul 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.