Executive and Legislative Offices, Combined · Tennessee

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept.

Nashville, TN · ~174 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Executive and Legislative Offices, Combined workplace, earning a grade B.

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept.: 2.5 TCR = 78% of Executive and Legislative Offices, Combined BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. safety composite

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 55%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. held a steady TCR band

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 1.7 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.7 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Nashville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 78% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #20/59
  • PHOTO County of Lexington
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: County of Lexington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. averages 2.5 TCR (78% of the Executive and Legislative Offices, Combined BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. falls in its industry

239 Executive and Legislative Offi establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 59 Executive and Legislative Offi employers in Tennessee.

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. (174 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept.
Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. (174 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Metro Nash Emergency Communications Dept. has fewer employees than the Executive and Legislative Offices, Combi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2020 2.2 0.6 4 0 0
2019 4.5 1.3 7 0 0
2018 2.4 1.8 4 0 0
2017 1.7 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · TN · Nashville

239 Executive and Legislative Offices, Combined employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,187 employers in Nashville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR County of Lexington 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR JUVENILE COURT 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Hall 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 911 Communications 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3330 Chattanooga Mill 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE UST, dba Landmark Ceramics 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri City Extrusion Plant 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shiloh Clarksville 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon Enterprises, LLC 15,267 FTE
CITY-NEAR METROPOLITAN GOVT. OF NASHVILLE,& DAVIDSON COUNTY 10,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Centennial Medical Center 3,106 FTE
NAT-TCR King City Senior Village 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR L. F. Manufacturing, Inc. Waycross Plant 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rinker LASCP 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ironwood 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Encore Plastics Inc. 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villa Financial Services 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Missouri - 1002 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE JAX 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.