Water distribution (except irrigation) · Arizona

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District

Tucson, AZ · ~54 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District runs at 675% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water distribution (except irrigation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District: 8.1 TCR = 675% of Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District safety composite

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District: 3.9 → 9.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2023

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District's TCR rose 5.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 9.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 675% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #24/30
  • PHOTO Water Treatment Faci…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Water Treatment Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District averages 8.1 TCR (675% of the Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=9.1 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=9.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District falls in its industry

727 Water distribution (except irr establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 30 Water distribution (except irr employers in Arizona.

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District (54 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District
Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District (54 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District has more employees than the Water distribution (except irrigation) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.8 6.5 6 0 0
2022 8.3 3.3 5 0 0
2019 9.1 9.1 5 0 0
2018 9.5 3.8 5 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · AZ · Tucson

727 Water distribution (except irrigation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Water Treatment Facility 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kitsap Public Utility #1 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mukilteo Water and Wastewater District 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lowcountry Regional Water System 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE KB Home Tucson 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lloyd 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hobaica 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Argus Contracting LP - Phoenix 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DVB4 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Winona MN FXFE-WIM 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR wedi Corp 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Loyola Ctr for Health-Burr Ridge 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silsbee Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Silsbee Convalescent Center 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovative Electrical Solutions 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tacoma Roofing & Waterproofing 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaGrander's Hillside Dairy, Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.