Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · South Carolina

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict

Greenville, SC · ~64 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict: 3.0 TCR = 247% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict safety composite

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict: 0.0 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.66× in 2024

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict's TCR rose 5.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 247% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO Bridgeport WWTP
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bridgeport WWTP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict averages 3.0 TCR (247% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in South Carolina.

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict (64 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict
Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict (64 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Metropolitan Sewer Subdistrict has more employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 1.9 5 1 0
2023 4.3 1.1 4 0 0
2022 6.3 2.5 5 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 0 1 0
2018 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · SC · Greenville

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bridgeport WWTP 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Treatment Plant 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Environmental Systems Service, Ltd. (Culpeper, VA) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water Pollution Control Facility 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Myrtle Beach Service Center/ Technical Services 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reeves Structures 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent Companies 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solvay USA, Spartanburg Site 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Nicholasville Store 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aloe Vera of America, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brooklyn Park 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE IECC - District Office 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gillespie CUSD7 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Administration Building 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jamestown 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.