Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Illinois

Northeast Treatment Plant

Urbana, IL · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northeast Treatment Plant runs at 243% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Northeast Treatment Plant: 2.9 TCR = 243% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northeast Treatment Plant safety composite

Northeast Treatment Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Northeast Treatment Plant: 2.5 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Northeast Treatment Plant's TCR rose 3.3 from 2.5 in 2017 to 5.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Urbana, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 243% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #15/48
  • PHOTO Water Pollution Cont…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Water Pollution Control Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Northeast Treatment Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northeast Treatment Plant averages 2.9 TCR (243% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northeast Treatment Plant TCR series: 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=5 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Northeast Treatment Plant falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 48 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Illinois.

Northeast Treatment Plant (47 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Northeast Treatment Plant
Northeast Treatment Plant (47 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Northeast Treatment Plant has more employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2023 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · IL · Urbana

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 95 employers in Urbana, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Water Pollution Control Facility 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Refuse Division - Keehi Transfer Station 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Service Authority 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgeport WWTP 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1987-Jerseyville, IL (Monsanto Co.) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stonington, IL-Mfg 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prairie Power, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Distribution Operating - Decatur 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Urbana Campus 23,671 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARLE 18,152 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL 8,566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heart of Mary Medical Center 651 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. - Waverly 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mac's Snacks 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Jorgensen Company Bakersfield 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Clauss Construction San Diego 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elaine's Pet Resorts Madera 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE CIA 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitch's Green Thumb Landscaping Corp. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harbor Fish Market 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.