Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Wisconsin

Meyer Utility Structures

Hager City, WI · ~214 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meyer Utility Structures runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Meyer Utility Structures: 3.4 TCR = 103% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meyer Utility Structures safety composite

Meyer Utility Structures scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.4

2018→2024

Meyer Utility Structures injury rate improved

Meyer Utility Structures's TCR fell 16.4 from 16.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=16.4 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Hager City, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 103% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO Main Plant
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Meyer Utility Structures in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meyer Utility Structures averages 3.4 TCR (103% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meyer Utility Structures TCR series: 2018=16.4 · 2019=4 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Meyer Utility Structures falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Wisconsin.

Meyer Utility Structures (214 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Meyer Utility Structures
Meyer Utility Structures (214 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Meyer Utility Structures has more employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 1.0 3 0 0
2021 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2020 0.9 0.4 2 0 0
2019 4.0 0.9 8 1 0
2018 16.4 5.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · WI · Hager City

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 3 employers in Hager City, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main Plant 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viant Collegeville, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plymouth Tube Company - Trent 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Synergy Manufacturing, Inc. 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ledgeview 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shiloh Pleasant Prairie 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neenah 1515 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Purina PetCare Company - Hager City 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR GFL Solid Waste Midwest LLC-Hager City HC 21 FTE
NAT-TCR Hasse Contracting Company Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR General Technologies, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Delta Sky Club Msy 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Miami, FL (GDC) 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Home Office 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE IAC, Alma 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith Trucking Inc 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE 60 - Dickson 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.