wired telecommunication carriers · Michigan

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040

Walker, MI · ~340 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical wired telecommunication carriers workplace, earning a grade A.

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040: 0.1 TCR = 19% of wired telecommunication carriers BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 safety composite

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 held a steady TCR band

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.3 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Walker, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/19
  • PHOTO MO_St. Louis_12405 P…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~340 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MO_St. Louis_12405 Powerscourt_21111000 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 averages 0.1 TCR (19% of the wired telecommunication carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 TCR series: 2022=0.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 0.7

Where MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 falls in its industry

455 wired telecommunication carrie establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 19 wired telecommunication carrie employers in Michigan.

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 (340 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040
MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 (340 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

MI_Walker_3355 Walker Ave_call ctr_81208040 has fewer employees than the wired telecommunication carriers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.3 0.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · MI · Walker

455 wired telecommunication carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 67 employers in Walker, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MO_St. Louis_12405 Powerscourt_21111000 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX_San Antonio_12238 Silicon Drive_TX211110 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NJ59710 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CASRNTCA 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE EW Grobbel 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations - Plant 5 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE KTP - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE CS Manufacturing 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DGR1 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR BHI Bissell Homecare Inc. 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walker Stamping & Assembly (Challenge Manufacturing-Plant 1) 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Contract Manufacturing Grand Rapids 465 FTE
NAT-TCR Philips NAM Personal Health Stamford CT 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR VA004 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR DuPont Chestnut Run Plaza 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Avnet San Jose US18S 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE CentraCare Clinic River Campus 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Region : Czu 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE 16021-Louisville 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHRLNCUN 340 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.