Distribution of electric power · Florida

Miami - Central Service Center

Miami, FL · ~117 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Miami - Central Service Center runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

Miami - Central Service Center: 1.4 TCR = 118% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Miami - Central Service Center safety composite

Miami - Central Service Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Miami - Central Service Center held a steady TCR band

Miami - Central Service Center's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.0 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Miami, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 118% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #72/135
  • PHOTO Ocotillo Service Cen…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ocotillo Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Miami - Central Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Miami - Central Service Center averages 1.4 TCR (118% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Miami - Central Service Center TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Miami - Central Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 135 Distribution of electric power employers in Florida.

Miami - Central Service Center (117 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Miami - Central Service Center
Miami - Central Service Center (117 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Miami - Central Service Center has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.3 0.6 1 1 0
2017 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · FL · Miami

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ocotillo Service Center 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mecklenburg Electric Chase City District 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apopka Complex 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Entergy El Dorado 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Florida Keys Electric Cooperative 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE HOTEL ATHLETIC CLUB 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mader Southeast 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Centerline Utilities, Inc. 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR US102: Kansas City 332 - SG 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alcon - Houston 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MGA (Middle Georgia) 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SOUTH 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Birmingham, AL HVAC 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dexter Axle Company - Plant 23 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Las Vegas Linen 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Ranch TN 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.