Fire sprinkler system installation · Kansas

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG

Lenexa, KS · ~100 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade B.

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG: 1.4 TCR = 50% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG safety composite

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG: 0.9 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2021

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.9 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Lenexa, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #14/53
  • PHOTO Harris Rochester, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harris Rochester, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows US102: Kansas City 332 - SG averages 1.4 TCR (50% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where US102: Kansas City 332 - SG falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 53 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in Kansas.

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG (100 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate US102: Kansas City 332 - SG
US102: Kansas City 332 - SG (100 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

US102: Kansas City 332 - SG has more employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.8 1.9 4 0 0
2016 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · KS · Lenexa

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 319 employers in Lenexa, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harris Rochester, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Protection Services LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Heating & Cooling Services, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR L&S Plumbing Partnership, Ltd. d/b/a L&S Mechanical - San Antonio Location 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kansas City, MO - Topeka, KS HVAC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE DH Pace Door Services - Special Markets 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE 04888300-00W002 BIRNER KANSAS LLC-BIRNER KANSAS LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Boiler Works, Inc. 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR RailCrew Xpress 3,169 FTE
CITY-NEAR LENEXA (KSLEN) 2,266 FTE
CITY-NEAR KSLEN - LENEXA 2,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kiewit Corporation_9401 Renner Boulevard 1,653 FTE
NAT-TCR Miami - Central Service Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alcon - Houston 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MGA (Middle Georgia) 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SOUTH 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Honolulu, HI HVAC 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Middletown General Government (City Hall) 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Container 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Concrete Construction Ltd. 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.